Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
655-705
Complete the Passage
A writer argues that the government should not intervene in struggling private companies because it lacks the expertise to run them effectively. However, the government would only need to appoint the leadership team rather than handle daily operations. Just as politicians, who may not be experts in military strategy, appoint high-ranking military leaders responsible for national defense, they could similarly appoint competent management for a bank. The writer's argument, if valid, suggests a reason to reject which of the following?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
A. Leading a military unit requires more expertise than managing a bank.
B
B. Politicians are effective in selecting military leaders for national defense.
C
C. Politicians cannot effectively manage the daily operations of a bank.
D
D. Government-owned banks cannot be managed effectively.
E
E. The government should not intervene in private companies that are financially stable.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
S
SameerMay 1, 2025
Can someone explain it other way?
Details
Difficulty
655-705
Type
CR