Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
605-655
Conclusion
I acknowledge that Jordan's actions led to significant harm to Taylor. I also agree that Jordan was fully aware of the nature of his actions and their potential consequences. Indeed, I would not argue against the notion that intentionally causing such harm is condemnable, all else being equal. However, I ask you to agree with me that Jordan's actions should not be entirely condemned, as he mistakenly believed Taylor to be the burglar who had been plaguing the east-side neighborhoods for several weeks. Which one of the following most accurately captures the conclusion of the argument?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
Jordan should not be held accountable for the injuries inflicted on Taylor.
B
The burglar who had been plaguing the east-side neighborhoods should be deemed as responsible for Taylor's injuries as Jordan.
C
Jordan's actions that caused significant harm to Taylor are not entirely blameworthy.
D
Jordan believed that Taylor was the individual who had been plaguing the east-side neighborhoods for the past few weeks.
E
Jordan's actions that caused significant harm to Taylor were condemnable, all else being equal.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
M
MadonnaJan 25, 2025
thanks a lot
Details
Difficulty
605-655
Type
CR