Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
655-705
Resolve a Paradox
Researchers observed that students who participated in after-school tutoring programs generally achieved higher grades than those who did not attend such programs. However, when comprehensive evaluations were conducted to determine the effectiveness of after-school tutoring on academic performance, the findings were inconsistent and suggested that in some instances, after-school tutoring might not improve grades.
Which of the following statements, if accurate, would most effectively clarify why the evaluation results varied from the initial observations?
Which of the following statements, if accurate, would most effectively clarify why the evaluation results varied from the initial observations?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
The primary goal of after-school tutoring was not solely to enhance grades but also to provide additional support for struggling students.
B
Many educators involved in after-school tutoring programs lacked formal training in effective teaching strategies.
C
Students who attended after-school tutoring were often more motivated and engaged in their studies compared to their peers.
D
Some students in the evaluation continued to skip classes despite participating in after-school tutoring.
E
The understanding of how after-school tutoring impacts academic performance has evolved with ongoing research.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
2
Sign in to join the discussion
Z
ZosėMar 18, 2025
greatt question!
Details
Difficulty
655-705
Type
CR