Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Many advocates for personal freedom support the elimination of laws against so-called 'consensual offenses,' which typically include activities like drug use, gambling, and certain sexual practices. However, the classification of drug use as a consensual offense is contentious. Beyond the numerous crimes such as theft and assault linked to drug users, which are separate from the act of drug use itself, the addiction can inflict significant emotional pain on others. For instance, family members and friends of the user often endure distress as they observe the decline and potential demise of the user. Thus, drug use may not be accurately labeled as a consensual offense.
Which of the following, if true, most significantly undermines the argument above?
Which of the following, if true, most significantly undermines the argument above?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
Those who are impacted indirectly by a crime cannot be considered victims of that crime.
B
Both gambling and certain sexual practices can also lead to emotional distress for those close to the offender.
C
Drug use is unique in that it poses both medical and legal challenges.
D
Not all advocates for personal freedom believe that all laws concerning consensual offenses should be abolished.
E
Historical evidence suggests that efforts to regulate drug use through legal means have often failed.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
N
NhungMar 22, 2025
thanksss
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR