Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Many environmental advocates support the elimination of regulations on activities deemed 'non-harmful,' which typically include practices like camping, hiking, and fishing. However, it is debatable whether fishing can truly be classified as a non-harmful activity. Beyond the ecological impact on fish populations, the practice can lead to significant distress for local communities that rely on these resources for their livelihood. For instance, those who depend on fishing for their income – local fishermen, their families, and the businesses that serve them – certainly experience hardship as they witness the depletion of fish stocks. In this context, fishing can hardly be considered a non-harmful activity.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
Fishing is a recreational activity that many people enjoy without causing harm to others.
B
Other non-harmful activities, such as camping and hiking, can also negatively impact local ecosystems.
C
The depletion of fish stocks affects only a small number of communities.
D
Many environmental advocates believe that all regulations should be maintained to protect local economies.
E
Fishing is regulated in many areas to ensure sustainability.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
3
Sign in to join the discussion
M
MuditJan 26, 2025
greatt question!
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR