Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
555-605
Weaken
Two tech firms, Azure and Nimbus, each pay HealthCorp to provide health insurance for their staff. Because early intervention for high blood pressure can prevent heart attacks that might occur years later, HealthCorp encourages Azure employees to have their blood pressure checked and to seek early treatment for high blood pressure. Nimbus employees typically stay with Nimbus for only a short period, however. Therefore, HealthCorp has no financial motivation to provide similar encouragement to Nimbus employees.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
(A) Early intervention for high blood pressure does not guarantee that a heart attack will not occur later in life.
B
(B) Many individuals seek early treatment for high blood pressure independently.
C
(C) Azure employs a considerable number of former Nimbus employees.
D
(D) Azure and Nimbus have roughly the same number of employees.
E
(E) Nimbus employees are not, on average, significantly older than Azure employees.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
V
vanshitaJan 14, 2025
thanksss
Details
Difficulty
555-605
Type
CR