Free Practice Question
RC · Reading Comprehension
705-805
Short Passage - Humanities
Reading Passage
The topic of criminality in Andrew Blanchard’s
work is a commonly pursued one. Its richness lies as
much within the thematic framework of Blanchard’s
prose as it does within the author’s own scandalous
(5) life. Not surprisingly, scholars frequently examine
Blanchard’s fictional world for clues that could reveal
the “real” story of their author. While the verdict of
such critiques traverses the entire spectrum of moral
judgments, from wholehearted compassion to reluctant
(10) absolution and dismissive condemnation, they all share
a certain smugness that prevents them from appreciating
the poetic brilliance of their objet de critique.
At the less commendable end of this critical
spectrum is Mark Newman’s 1989 study titled, Andrew
(15) Blanchard: Biography of Deceit. In his book, Newman
undertakes the formidable challenge of correcting and
clarifying certain aspects of Blanchard’s biography.
The study, a detective narrative in its own right, seeks
to expose Blanchard not only as a petty thief, but also
(20) as a bad playwright. Newman holds no punches in
condemning Blanchard’s plays as disturbing, distasteful,
even disgusting. He even dislikes the playwright’s
penchant for meta-theater, arguing that only a highly
skilled dramaturge can interweave multiple plays-
(25) within-a-play and still maintain a coherent narrative
structure. The implication being, of course, that
Blanchard was far from being a skilled dramaturge.
work is a commonly pursued one. Its richness lies as
much within the thematic framework of Blanchard’s
prose as it does within the author’s own scandalous
(5) life. Not surprisingly, scholars frequently examine
Blanchard’s fictional world for clues that could reveal
the “real” story of their author. While the verdict of
such critiques traverses the entire spectrum of moral
judgments, from wholehearted compassion to reluctant
(10) absolution and dismissive condemnation, they all share
a certain smugness that prevents them from appreciating
the poetic brilliance of their objet de critique.
At the less commendable end of this critical
spectrum is Mark Newman’s 1989 study titled, Andrew
(15) Blanchard: Biography of Deceit. In his book, Newman
undertakes the formidable challenge of correcting and
clarifying certain aspects of Blanchard’s biography.
The study, a detective narrative in its own right, seeks
to expose Blanchard not only as a petty thief, but also
(20) as a bad playwright. Newman holds no punches in
condemning Blanchard’s plays as disturbing, distasteful,
even disgusting. He even dislikes the playwright’s
penchant for meta-theater, arguing that only a highly
skilled dramaturge can interweave multiple plays-
(25) within-a-play and still maintain a coherent narrative
structure. The implication being, of course, that
Blanchard was far from being a skilled dramaturge.
It can be inferred from the passage that Mark Newman would be most likely to agree with each one of the following statements about the work of Andrew Blanchard, EXCEPT:
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
It is written by someone with a criminal past.
B
It is not the product of a highly skilled dramaturge.
C
It requires correction and clarification.
D
It can be offensive as well as incoherent.
E
It makes an unsuccessful attempt at meta-theater.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
Sign in to join the discussion
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts and help others understand it better.
Sign in to commentDetails
Difficulty
705-805
Type
RC
Category