Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
605-655
Conclusion
A journalist states: "The governor's challengers argue that the issues surrounding the deputy governor's financial disclosures render the governor unqualified for re-election. However, the deputy governor was elected by the citizens in a previous election before the governor took office. Additionally, the deputy governor's financial discrepancies can be attributed to a minor oversight by an accountant and do not reflect on the deputy governor's capability to fulfill his responsibilities.".
Which of the following best captures the main point of the argument presented above?
Which of the following best captures the main point of the argument presented above?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
The governor is unqualified for re-election.
B
The deputy governor is capable of fulfilling his responsibilities.
C
Critics should not conflate the governor's qualifications with the deputy governor's qualifications.
D
The governor's challengers' claims regarding the deputy governor's financial issues in relation to the governor's re-election are fundamentally flawed.
E
The deputy governor is responsible for the errors in his financial disclosures.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
A
AdityaMar 22, 2025
Thank for sharing!
Details
Difficulty
605-655
Type
CR