Free Practice Question
CR · Critical Reasoning
605-655
Conclusion
Recent regulations that mandate separate areas for smokers and non-smokers in privately owned establishments are seen as an unwarranted interference in the private sector. While research shows that non-smokers could be adversely affected by secondhand smoke, the core issue lies in the government's infringement on the rights of private businesses to set their own policies. Which principle, if accepted, would support this conclusion?
Answer Choices
Sign in to reveal the correct answerA
The right of businesses to self-governance takes precedence over any obligation the government has to safeguard individuals.
B
Government interference in the operations of private businesses is acceptable only when there is a risk of harm to individuals.
C
The obligation of private businesses is to ensure a safe environment for their employees.
D
The right of individuals to access clean air is more important than the autonomy of businesses from government oversight.
E
When the rights of businesses clash with government responsibilities, the focus should be on achieving a workable compromise.
Reveal the correct answer
Sign in for free to check your answer and unlock the full explanation.
Track your performance and improve
Get detailed analytics, unlock full explanations, and move up difficulty tiers as you practice.
Explanation
Unlock the full explanation
Create a free account to reveal the correct answer, see the step-by-step explanation, and start tracking your GMAT progress.
Comments
4
Sign in to join the discussion
A
AlessandroFeb 17, 2025
Amazing
Details
Difficulty
605-655
Type
CR